11/30/2022 0 Comments Sequential testing epidemiology![]() ![]() ![]() 3,9 If most examinees perform well relative to the pass/fail cutoff score, short tests can still yield reproducible pass/fail decisions, in particular for examinees at upper ability levels. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 The reproducibility of the test scores is related to test length. As an alternative to receiver operator characteristic analysis, minimization of the loss function was found to be an appropriate method to determine the optimum cutoff value of the screening test.Įxaminations that use standardized patients (SP-based tests) are adequate in many respects, but the related costs can be a serious drawback, particularly since SP-based tests require a large sample of stations leading to a considerable test length. This can considerably reduce testing time (30% to 40%), while keeping the percentage of false positives at an acceptably low level of less than 0.2%. In a sequential SP-based test, the pass/fail cutoff score of the screening test should be stringent. Using those cutoff values, only 26% and 11% of the students would have had to take the complete test to get a “true” score, while only 0.2% and 0.0% of the students who passed the screening test went on to fail the complete test (false positives). Accordingly, stringent pass/fail cutoff scores in the screening test (75% for Group 1 and 80% for Group 2) produced optimum results. The negative predictive value (probability that a student would fail the complete test if he or she had failed the screening test) was low (96%). They developed and evaluated a new method to determine the optimum cutoff score of the screening test, a method based on minimization of the loss represented by the (weighted) numbers of false positives and negatives in the screening test. They investigated efficiency and validity as a function of the cutoff score of the screening test. In a simulation experiment based on the data from those tests, the authors considered the first day as the screening test and the second day as the second test. In 1994–95, first- through fourth-year (Group 1) and sixth-year (Group 2) medical students at the University of Maastricht took SP-based tests. This study investigated whether sequential testing increases efficiency with only a minor decrease of validity. In this approach, students take a short screening test only those who fail take a second test. Educators who use standardized-patient-based (SP-based) tests may save resources by using sequential testing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |